{"ok":true,"stdout":"{\n  \"review\": \"Adversarial Review\",\n  \"target\": {\n    \"mode\": \"working-tree\",\n    \"label\": \"working tree diff\",\n    \"explicit\": false\n  },\n  \"threadId\": \"01a15421-7da9-7990-bbd3-45d70158a197\",\n  \"context\": {\n    \"repoRoot\": \"/home/madsc/work/insuniverse-temp/.worktrees/admin-rbac\",\n    \"branch\": \"feat/admin-rbac\",\n    \"summary\": \"Reviewing 0 staged, 9 unstaged, and 14 untracked file(s).\"\n  },\n  \"codex\": {\n    \"status\": 0,\n    \"stderr\": \"\",\n    \"stdout\": \"{\\\"verdict\\\":\\\"needs-attention\\\",\\\"summary\\\":\\\"Do not ship yet: two stalled database operations can disable permission monitoring indefinitely.\\\",\\\"findings\\\":[{\\\"severity\\\":\\\"high\\\",\\\"title\\\":\\\"Timeouts never recover occupied monitoring slots\\\",\\\"body\\\":\\\"The 300 ms timeout only finishes Promise.race; inflight decreases only when the underlying evaluation settles. Two stalled queries therefore cause every subsequent judgment to be skipped. The dedicated pool configures a connection timeout but no query deadline or cancellation. An in-memory reproduction left two evaluations unresolved, then made subsequent evaluations available: all 10 subsequent requests were skipped, with zero additional evaluations. Skips produce no warning and are exposed only through the SIGUSR2 snapshot, so this failure can hide permission violations throughout the observation period.\\\",\\\"file\\\":\\\"insuniverse-server/apps/api/src/modules/auth/access-control/access-control.interceptor.ts\\\",\\\"line_start\\\":153,\\\"line_end\\\":164,\\\"confidence\\\":0.99,\\\"recommendation\\\":\\\"Bound the underlying database work and destroy or cancel stalled connections before reclaiming slots. Add a recovery test proving fresh judgments resume after timeout while outstanding database work remains bounded, and emit a rate-limited warning for sustained skipping.\\\"}],\\\"next_steps\\\":[\\\"Implement bounded database cancellation and slot recovery, then verify monitoring resumes after two stalled queries.\\\"]}\",\n    \"reasoning\": []\n  },\n  \"result\": {\n    \"verdict\": \"needs-attention\",\n    \"summary\": \"Do not ship yet: two stalled database operations can disable permission monitoring indefinitely.\",\n    \"findings\": [\n      {\n        \"severity\": \"high\",\n        \"title\": \"Timeouts never recover occupied monitoring slots\",\n        \"body\": \"The 300 ms timeout only finishes Promise.race; inflight decreases only when the underlying evaluation settles. Two stalled queries therefore cause every subsequent judgment to be skipped. The dedicated pool configures a connection timeout but no query deadline or cancellation. An in-memory reproduction left two evaluations unresolved, then made subsequent evaluations available: all 10 subsequent requests were skipped, with zero additional evaluations. Skips produce no warning and are exposed only through the SIGUSR2 snapshot, so this failure can hide permission violations throughout the observation period.\",\n        \"file\": \"insuniverse-server/apps/api/src/modules/auth/access-control/access-control.interceptor.ts\",\n        \"line_start\": 153,\n        \"line_end\": 164,\n        \"confidence\": 0.99,\n        \"recommendation\": \"Bound the underlying database work and destroy or cancel stalled connections before reclaiming slots. Add a recovery test proving fresh judgments resume after timeout while outstanding database work remains bounded, and emit a rate-limited warning for sustained skipping.\"\n      }\n    ],\n    \"next_steps\": [\n      \"Implement bounded database cancellation and slot recovery, then verify monitoring resumes after two stalled queries.\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"rawOutput\": \"{\\\"verdict\\\":\\\"needs-attention\\\",\\\"summary\\\":\\\"Do not ship yet: two stalled database operations can disable permission monitoring indefinitely.\\\",\\\"findings\\\":[{\\\"severity\\\":\\\"high\\\",\\\"title\\\":\\\"Timeouts never recover occupied monitoring slots\\\",\\\"body\\\":\\\"The 300 ms timeout only finishes Promise.race; inflight decreases only when the underlying evaluation settles. Two stalled queries therefore cause every subsequent judgment to be skipped. The dedicated pool configures a connection timeout but no query deadline or cancellation. An in-memory reproduction left two evaluations unresolved, then made subsequent evaluations available: all 10 subsequent requests were skipped, with zero additional evaluations. Skips produce no warning and are exposed only through the SIGUSR2 snapshot, so this failure can hide permission violations throughout the observation period.\\\",\\\"file\\\":\\\"insuniverse-server/apps/api/src/modules/auth/access-control/access-control.interceptor.ts\\\",\\\"line_start\\\":153,\\\"line_end\\\":164,\\\"confidence\\\":0.99,\\\"recommendation\\\":\\\"Bound the underlying database work and destroy or cancel stalled connections before reclaiming slots. Add a recovery test proving fresh judgments resume after timeout while outstanding database work remains bounded, and emit a rate-limited warning for sustained skipping.\\\"}],\\\"next_steps\\\":[\\\"Implement bounded database cancellation and slot recovery, then verify monitoring resumes after two stalled queries.\\\"]}\",\n  \"parseError\": null,\n  \"reasoningSummary\": []\n}\n","stderr":"","durationMs":71114,"classification":"ok","blocking":false,"advisory":false}