{"ok":true,"stdout":"{\n  \"review\": \"Adversarial Review\",\n  \"target\": {\n    \"mode\": \"branch\",\n    \"label\": \"branch diff against main\",\n    \"baseRef\": \"main\",\n    \"explicit\": false\n  },\n  \"threadId\": \"01a15290-18fa-7742-b1b9-8ee87a4e80d8\",\n  \"context\": {\n    \"repoRoot\": \"/home/madsc/work/insuniverse-temp/.worktrees/admin-rbac\",\n    \"branch\": \"feat/admin-rbac\",\n    \"summary\": \"Reviewing branch feat/admin-rbac against main from merge-base 3666cd5ac64ec3f379ca146e2d68f9fc97d251ad.\"\n  },\n  \"codex\": {\n    \"status\": 0,\n    \"stderr\": \"\",\n    \"stdout\": \"{\\n  \\\"verdict\\\": \\\"needs-attention\\\",\\n  \\\"summary\\\": \\\"Do not implement unchanged: the category rules misclassify protected handlers as public, and the exception validation cannot pass.\\\",\\n  \\\"findings\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"severity\\\": \\\"high\\\",\\n      \\\"title\\\": \\\"Preserve handler-level verification before the public fallback\\\",\\n      \\\"body\\\": \\\"The first-match rules classify 22 unguarded M1 rows marked '판정만' as '무조건 공개'. For example, PATCH /auth/reset-password requires a verified reset ticket in auth.service.ts:494–518, and GET /invoices/histories/:ivhId/merged-pdf-view verifies a resource-bound token in invoice.controller.ts:199–219. Neither has a listed guard or external-identity label, so both reach rule 7. This corrupts the security contract carried into later RBAC work; M2 itself does not remove their existing checks. The planned category validation checks vocabulary, not these semantics.\\\",\\n      \\\"file\\\": \\\".claude/PRPs/plans/admin-rbac-m2.plan.md\\\",\\n      \\\"line_start\\\": 143,\\n      \\\"line_end\\\": 149,\\n      \\\"confidence\\\": 1,\\n      \\\"recommendation\\\": \\\"Add explicit categories for handler/service verification and resource-token annotations before the public fallback. Reject unresolved '판정만' rows and test the reset-password, invoice PDF, and B2C cookie-verification cases.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"severity\\\": \\\"medium\\\",\\n      \\\"title\\\": \\\"Validate Swagger exceptions against their actual registration source\\\",\\n      \\\"body\\\": \\\"Check #8 requires every exact-path exception to appear in the frozen M1 controller table. Task 6 mandates /swagger and /swagger-json exceptions, but neither exists in that table: they are registered by setupSwagger. Consequently, the loop at line 335 exits nonzero under set -e even for the intended implementation, preventing the required validation from completing.\\\",\\n      \\\"file\\\": \\\".claude/PRPs/plans/admin-rbac-m2.plan.md\\\",\\n      \\\"line_start\\\": 330,\\n      \\\"line_end\\\": 338,\\n      \\\"confidence\\\": 1,\\n      \\\"recommendation\\\": \\\"Check application-route exceptions against the M1 table and Swagger exceptions against actual setupSwagger registrations. Require both groups to match their respective sources without altering the frozen controller inventory.\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"next_steps\\\": [\\n    \\\"Correct the category mapping and exception validation before implementing M2.\\\"\\n  ]\\n}\",\n    \"reasoning\": []\n  },\n  \"result\": {\n    \"verdict\": \"needs-attention\",\n    \"summary\": \"Do not implement unchanged: the category rules misclassify protected handlers as public, and the exception validation cannot pass.\",\n    \"findings\": [\n      {\n        \"severity\": \"high\",\n        \"title\": \"Preserve handler-level verification before the public fallback\",\n        \"body\": \"The first-match rules classify 22 unguarded M1 rows marked '판정만' as '무조건 공개'. For example, PATCH /auth/reset-password requires a verified reset ticket in auth.service.ts:494–518, and GET /invoices/histories/:ivhId/merged-pdf-view verifies a resource-bound token in invoice.controller.ts:199–219. Neither has a listed guard or external-identity label, so both reach rule 7. This corrupts the security contract carried into later RBAC work; M2 itself does not remove their existing checks. The planned category validation checks vocabulary, not these semantics.\",\n        \"file\": \".claude/PRPs/plans/admin-rbac-m2.plan.md\",\n        \"line_start\": 143,\n        \"line_end\": 149,\n        \"confidence\": 1,\n        \"recommendation\": \"Add explicit categories for handler/service verification and resource-token annotations before the public fallback. Reject unresolved '판정만' rows and test the reset-password, invoice PDF, and B2C cookie-verification cases.\"\n      },\n      {\n        \"severity\": \"medium\",\n        \"title\": \"Validate Swagger exceptions against their actual registration source\",\n        \"body\": \"Check #8 requires every exact-path exception to appear in the frozen M1 controller table. Task 6 mandates /swagger and /swagger-json exceptions, but neither exists in that table: they are registered by setupSwagger. Consequently, the loop at line 335 exits nonzero under set -e even for the intended implementation, preventing the required validation from completing.\",\n        \"file\": \".claude/PRPs/plans/admin-rbac-m2.plan.md\",\n        \"line_start\": 330,\n        \"line_end\": 338,\n        \"confidence\": 1,\n        \"recommendation\": \"Check application-route exceptions against the M1 table and Swagger exceptions against actual setupSwagger registrations. Require both groups to match their respective sources without altering the frozen controller inventory.\"\n      }\n    ],\n    \"next_steps\": [\n      \"Correct the category mapping and exception validation before implementing M2.\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"rawOutput\": \"{\\n  \\\"verdict\\\": \\\"needs-attention\\\",\\n  \\\"summary\\\": \\\"Do not implement unchanged: the category rules misclassify protected handlers as public, and the exception validation cannot pass.\\\",\\n  \\\"findings\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"severity\\\": \\\"high\\\",\\n      \\\"title\\\": \\\"Preserve handler-level verification before the public fallback\\\",\\n      \\\"body\\\": \\\"The first-match rules classify 22 unguarded M1 rows marked '판정만' as '무조건 공개'. For example, PATCH /auth/reset-password requires a verified reset ticket in auth.service.ts:494–518, and GET /invoices/histories/:ivhId/merged-pdf-view verifies a resource-bound token in invoice.controller.ts:199–219. Neither has a listed guard or external-identity label, so both reach rule 7. This corrupts the security contract carried into later RBAC work; M2 itself does not remove their existing checks. The planned category validation checks vocabulary, not these semantics.\\\",\\n      \\\"file\\\": \\\".claude/PRPs/plans/admin-rbac-m2.plan.md\\\",\\n      \\\"line_start\\\": 143,\\n      \\\"line_end\\\": 149,\\n      \\\"confidence\\\": 1,\\n      \\\"recommendation\\\": \\\"Add explicit categories for handler/service verification and resource-token annotations before the public fallback. Reject unresolved '판정만' rows and test the reset-password, invoice PDF, and B2C cookie-verification cases.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"severity\\\": \\\"medium\\\",\\n      \\\"title\\\": \\\"Validate Swagger exceptions against their actual registration source\\\",\\n      \\\"body\\\": \\\"Check #8 requires every exact-path exception to appear in the frozen M1 controller table. Task 6 mandates /swagger and /swagger-json exceptions, but neither exists in that table: they are registered by setupSwagger. Consequently, the loop at line 335 exits nonzero under set -e even for the intended implementation, preventing the required validation from completing.\\\",\\n      \\\"file\\\": \\\".claude/PRPs/plans/admin-rbac-m2.plan.md\\\",\\n      \\\"line_start\\\": 330,\\n      \\\"line_end\\\": 338,\\n      \\\"confidence\\\": 1,\\n      \\\"recommendation\\\": \\\"Check application-route exceptions against the M1 table and Swagger exceptions against actual setupSwagger registrations. Require both groups to match their respective sources without altering the frozen controller inventory.\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"next_steps\\\": [\\n    \\\"Correct the category mapping and exception validation before implementing M2.\\\"\\n  ]\\n}\",\n  \"parseError\": null,\n  \"reasoningSummary\": []\n}\n","stderr":"","durationMs":55619,"classification":"ok","blocking":false,"advisory":false}